www.wine-girl.net
    Home   |   Archives   |   Calendar   |   Wine & Food Pairing   |   Wine Trails
May 17

Awarding the Gold Medal

Medals_2Not long ago, we mentioned the Northern Kentucky Wine Festival. It’s this Saturday, in Alexandria, and features Kentucky wines and some great food and crafts. Last Sunday, Kevin and I got to judge wines for the festival. We learned a lot on Sunday, and there’s almost too much for one post. But I’ll try to squeeze it all in.

When you think of Kentucky wines, does that country song, "Strawberry Wine," come to mind? It shouldn’t. There are fruit wines in Kentucky (some darned good ones), but there are also some good wines from vinifera.

Kevin and I served as two judges on a 4-judge panel. There was one sanctioned judge and one experienced judge plus the two of us. We tasted around 70 wines over the course of the day. For a professional judge, that’s probably nothing. For us? We needed a beer when we were done. I definitely suffered from palate fatigue.

I think judging is overrated. Would I do it again? Yes, although it’s not something I’ll want to make a career of. I know it sounds fun – tasting a bunch of wine in one day. It’s truly hard work though. You want to be fair across the board. Medals mean a lot to the marketing of a small winery.

Wine competitions are not like the Olympics. There is not just one gold, one silver, and one bronze per category. Medals are awarded as needed. If the scoring for a wine adds up to a silver, that wine receives a silver. If the score doesn’t add up to a medal, no medal is awarded. Wines are judged on an individual basis, and not against each other.

It’s hard to not compare the various wines in a flight and to judge each wine on its own merits. Even harder is to forget personal biases. For instance, I’m not a fan of either Cabernet Franc or Chardonnay, but I needed to forget that and judge each wine based on whether it was a good example of that varietal.

Judging is also about the swirling, sniffing, swishing, and
spitting. My process was to swirl in the glass and take a few long
sniffs to identify the bouquet and the aroma. The question? Does it
smell like that varietal should smell? What additional aromas were
added?

From there, I took a decent sized drink and swished it around in my
mouth. I tipped my head forward and inhaled air, which helps bring out
more flavors. Then I spit. Sometimes I’d repeat the process.

We judged whites, blushes, then reds, followed by fruit wines,
champagne, and port. There were times when the barnyard aromas were so
intense that I had trouble tasting the wine. There were other times
when the wine was incredibly pleasant. I recall one flight of white
wines that was across the board bad. What people forget when thinking
about wine judging is that you have to take the bad along with the good.

We used a version of the AWS judging scale.  While I’m still attached
to my happy faces for everyday tasting, the AWS scale is a usable,
practical 20-point scale. I’ve put the explanation for the 20-point scale at the end of this post.

Once the wines in a flight were scored, we broke our silence and
discussed. If our scores weren’t within a few points of each other,
we’d try the wine again and talk about it.  The discussions were
generally easy, as we fell into a pattern of scoring similarly. The
whole experience made me feel better about my palate.

We also had the pleasure of meeting the winemaker for the state of
Kentucky,  Tom Cottrell, who was helping with the wine festival
competition. Technically, he is Extension Specialist for Enology at the
University of Kentucky. His job is to help
winemakers
in Kentucky grow the right types of grape for our soil, and
cultivate the right kinds of wines. Kentucky is still
learning, and there is a small problem several winemakers are having
with brettanomyces (brett). The subject of brett could be a whole other
blog post, as seen here.
A great definition is available from Mr. Wizard:

Brettanomyces is a particularly nasty yeast that is often the bane of
the collective existence of many winemakers. Its foul-smelling
byproducts have often been called “barnyardy” or “mouse pee-like” on
the sensory scale and it can often be detected in very minute
quantities. As to eradicating the microorganism that caused your wine
to go down the path of delinquency: As Dr. Roger Boulton, winemaking
professor at University of California, Davis puts it, “You’d better
just burn the whole winery down.”
So maybe it’s not that bad. What the good doctor was referring to is
the fact that Brettanomyces are very persistent little buggers. They
thrive in wines and they can even survive in emptied barrels, feasting
off of the sugars in the wood and any lovely leftovers, hiding in the
cracks that your barrel-cleaning system missed. They’re usually
transmitted from winery to winery via shared barrels or purchased bulk
wine. 

Tom is helping these winemakers with correcting the problem. He’s one of those guys I’m going to have to contact for an interview.
There’s a lot of information in his brain, and I would love to talk to
him some more.

That said, there are a lot of great Kentucky wines out there. In fact,
there is at least one gold medal winner, and several silver and bronzes
- and that’s just what the judges tasted. You can view the results of the wine competition here. See you at the festival!


AWS JUDGING SCALE


APPEARANCE


3 - Excellent - Brilliant with outstanding characteristic color.

2 - Good – Clear with characteristic color.

1 - Poor – Slight haze and/or slight off color.

0 - Objectionable – Cloudy and/or off color.


TASTE AND TEXTURE


6 - Extraordinary – Unmistakable characteristic
flavor of grape-variety or wine-type. Extraordinary balance. Smooth,
full-bodied and overwhelming.

5 – Excellent – All of the above but a little less. Excellent but not overwhelming.

4 – Good – Characteristic grape-variety or wine-type flavor. Good balance. Smooth. May have minor imperfections.

3 – Acceptable – Undistinguished wine but pleasant. May have minor off flavors. May be slightly out of balance, and/or somewhat thin or rough.

2 – Deficient – Undistinguished wine with more pronounced faults than above.

1 – Poor – Disagreeable flavors, poorly balanced, and/or unpleasant texture.

0 – Objectionable – Objectionable or offensive flavors and/or texture.


AROMA AND BOUQUET


6 - Extraordinary – Unmistakable characteristic aroma of grape-variety or wine-
type. Outstanding and complex bouquet. Exceptional balance
of aroma and bouquet.

5 – Excellent – Characteristic aroma. Complex bouquet. Well balanced.

4 – Good – Characteristic aroma. Distinguishable bouquet.

3 – Acceptable – Slight aroma and bouquet. Pleasant.

2 – Deficient – No perceptible aroma or bouquet or with slight off odors.

1 – Poor – Off odors.

0 – Objectionable – Objectionable or offensive odors.

AFTERTASTE

3 – Excellent
– Lingering outstanding aftertaste.

2 – Good – Pleasant aftertaste.

1 – Poor – Little or no distinguishable aftertaste.
0 – Objectionable – Unpleasant aftertaste.

OVERALL IMPRESSION
2 – Excellent
1 – Good
0 – Poor

TOTAL SCORES
18-20 -  Extraordinary
15-17 Excellent
12-14 Good
9-11 Commercially Acceptable
6-8 Deficient
0-5 Poor and Objectionable

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Share on FacebookEmail This
Copyright Creative Commons by-nc-nd My Wine Education.
Posted by Michelle at 1:00 pm in Cincinnati, Local, Tastings, Wine Events, Wineries | Permalink | Comments (3)

3 Responses to “Awarding the Gold Medal”

  1. Awarding the Gold Medal

  2. Michelle says:

    This is just my own test comment.

  3. I have used the AWS scale, but I am more partial to a 100-point scale which is used very commonly.
    I hope you don’t mind that I am going to share with you my own wine scoring sheet. I developed this because I was offering in-home winetastings and I wanted my audience to be able to remember what they liked and why so they could go back and re-order. One nice thing about it is that it’s customizable. Enjoy! Winetasting Score Sheet

Contributing Authors

Wine-Girl.net Rating Scale

Recent Posts

Categories

Wine Competitions Wine Book Club (WBC) Wine Judging Reviews Readings Whiskey Watch France Weblogs Games Wine Clubs Books RIP Repost WBW #65 Wine Glossary Wine Maps TasteCamp Web/Tech Marketing Uncategorized Legislation Recipes Florida Recession Wine Meet the Winemaker Greatest Hits Holiday Drink Pink! (BCRF) Television Current Affairs Wine Shop Wednesday Photos Spirits Contests Scotch & Whiskey History Disney Wine Tech Food and Wine Pairings Mad Men Monday Guest Writers Pop Culture Food and Drink Wine Blogs Knowledge Entertainment Dinner and Drinks Life Charity Benefits News Beer-Guy.net Beer Special Events WBW Local Wineries Cocktails Wine Shops Restaurants Travel Wine Notes Wineries Wine Events Weekly Cincinnati Wine Events Wine Misc Local Tastings Cincinnati

Links That Make Us Happy

Sponsors


sponsors

WineGirl on Facebook

Krystal Pepper Memorial Scholarship Fund

Raising money for a scholarship fund in memory of Michelle's little sister who passed away in 2007Click here for information on the Krystal Pepper Memorial Scholarship Fund.


Winner, Best Cincinnati Weblog 2007

Alltop, all the cool kids (and me)

Ads from our kind sponsors …